Is Sitefinity Still Worth It in 2026? An Honest Take

I spent over a decade building sites on Sitefinity. It paid my bills, taught me enterprise development, and gave me deep expertise in .NET CMS architecture.

Then I expanded into Laravel and modern PHP stacks—not because Sitefinity failed, but because different projects have different needs. Today I work across both worlds and still build Sitefinity sites with genuine enthusiasm when the project context calls for it.

That dual perspective—knowing what modern alternatives offer while still actively working with Sitefinity—lets me give you an honest assessment of where it stands in 2026.

No vendor fluff. No competitor bashing. Just reality.

What Sitefinity does well

Let's start with the positives, because there are genuine reasons companies still choose Sitefinity.

Enterprise-grade content management

Sitefinity handles complex content workflows like a champ. Multi-site management, granular permissions, approval workflows, scheduled publishing — it's all there, battle-tested over years of enterprise deployments.

If you're a large organization with multiple content teams, strict compliance requirements, and complex publishing workflows, Sitefinity delivers.

AI capabilities that actually matter

Sitefinity has made serious moves in AI—and unlike many vendors, these aren't just marketing buzzwords.

Agentic RAG for dynamic experiences: The new Generative CMS powered by Progress Agentic RAG goes beyond static personalization. Content assembles in real-time based on user intent, creating adaptive journeys that are governed, explainable, and on-brand.

AI-assisted development: Widget development is 60% faster with MCP Server integration. Natural-language prompts generate production-ready widgets for Next.js and ASP.NET Core without config file archaeology. Developer onboarding drops by 80%.

Content creation with Azure OpenAI: Built-in OpenAI integration brings context-aware drafting, editing, and classification directly into the editor. AI-powered tagging, hybrid image search (find visuals by description, not filename), and instant translation via Microsoft Translator.

Sitefinity AI Assistant (SAIA): A conversational chatbot widget that surfaces existing content through natural language queries. It's governed (no hallucinations from external sources), multilingual, and integrates with your CDP for personalized responses.

If you're evaluating Sitefinity and AI is on your roadmap, these capabilities are production-ready now—not coming soon.

Multilingual + multisite excellence

This is where Sitefinity truly shines. Managing 50+ sites across 10+ languages with shared content pools, localized workflows, and granular permissions? Sitefinity is built for this complexity.

AI-assisted translation accelerates localization without sacrificing quality. Multisite content reuse prevents duplication. Role-based permissions keep governance tight across global teams.

Few platforms handle this combination as elegantly.

Personalization and marketing tools

The built-in personalization engine is genuinely good. Segment visitors, serve targeted content, run A/B tests, track conversions—without duct-taping together five different SaaS tools.

Sitefinity Insight CDP adds AI-driven propensity scoring, attribution modeling, and segment discovery. For marketing teams that want power without developer dependency, this matters.

.NET ecosystem integration

If your organization runs on Microsoft stack—Azure, Active Directory, Dynamics, SharePoint—Sitefinity fits naturally. Authentication, integrations, and hosting align with what your IT team already knows.

Stability and long-term support

Progress (the company behind Sitefinity) isn't going anywhere. Sitefinity 15.4 LTS has support through 2030. You get regular updates, security patches, and actual support. For enterprises that need vendor stability and SLAs, this provides peace of mind.

Where Sitefinity struggles

Now for the harder truths.

Developer experience is heavier than modern alternatives

The development workflow has improved but still feels weightier than modern frameworks. You're dealing with:

• Visual Studio dependency (less painful with VS Code support, but still heavier)
• Longer build times compared to Laravel/Next.js hot reload
• Widget development that requires more boilerplate than component-based frameworks

The AI-assisted development helps, but compare spinning up a Sitefinity project versus laravel new or create-next-app. The gap is real.

The talent pool is shrinking

Finding Sitefinity developers is increasingly difficult. Fewer developers are entering the .NET CMS space. Training costs are high. When your lead developer leaves, replacing them is a real challenge.

This isn't Sitefinity's fault specifically—it's the broader market moving toward JavaScript frameworks, headless architectures, and cloud-native solutions.

Licensing costs add up

Sitefinity isn't cheap. Licensing, hosting, and maintenance costs can easily reach $50k+ annually for mid-size deployments. That's fine for enterprises with budgets to match, but it prices out smaller organizations.

Compare this to open-source alternatives where licensing is $0 and you pay only for hosting.

The headless story is solid, but not purpose-built

Sitefinity added robust headless/decoupled capabilities, and they work well. But purpose-built headless CMS platforms like Contentful, Sanity, and Strapi have years of API-first thinking baked in.

If you're going headless anyway, consider whether you need the full traditional CMS stack underneath.

When you should choose Sitefinity

Here are scenarios where Sitefinity is genuinely the right choice—for both new projects and existing implementations:

✅ Complex multisite + multilingual setups — Managing 50+ sites across 10+ languages with shared content, workflows, and localization? Sitefinity is built for this. The combination of multisite management, AI-assisted translation, and granular permissions makes it a strong choice when multilingual complexity is high. This applies to new projects just as much as existing ones.

✅ You're starting an enterprise project in the Microsoft ecosystem — New project with .NET developers, Azure infrastructure, and Active Directory integration? Sitefinity fits naturally. You'll spend less time fighting infrastructure and more time building features.

✅ You're already invested — Migrating away is expensive and risky. If Sitefinity works and your team knows it, staying might be smarter than chasing trends. Sitefinity 15.4 LTS supports you through 2030.

✅ You need enterprise compliance — Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) value Sitefinity's security certifications, audit trails, and WCAG 2.2 compliance tools.

✅ Your org lives in Microsoft-land — Azure AD integration, .NET developers on staff, existing Microsoft agreements. The ecosystem fit reduces friction.

✅ Marketing team autonomy with AI — If marketers need sophisticated personalization, AI-driven content recommendations, propensity scoring, and agentic content delivery without constant developer help, Sitefinity delivers.

✅ You want AI capabilities beyond content generation — Sitefinity's Agentic RAG, AI Assistant, and CDP integration go further than "write me a blog post."

When you should look elsewhere

🚫 You're starting fresh with a small team and simple needs — If you're building a blog, small business site, or straightforward marketing site, Sitefinity is overkill. The setup cost and learning curve aren't justified.

🚫 Developer velocity is critical — If shipping fast is your priority, lighter frameworks will get you there faster.

🚫 Budget is tight — The total cost of ownership is significant. Factor in licensing, hosting, and developer salaries.

🚫 You want headless-first architecture — Sitefinity can do headless well, but purpose-built headless CMS platforms (Sanity, Strapi, Contentful) are optimized for it.

The alternatives I'd consider today

If I were starting a new project today, here's what I'd evaluate:

For developer-centric teams

Laravel + Statamic or Laravel + Filament — Beautiful developer experience, modern PHP, flat-file or database-backed. Statamic scales surprisingly well—it handles everything from landing pages to enterprise content hubs. This is my current stack for most projects.

For headless needs

• Sanity — Structured content, excellent DX, real-time collaboration, flexible pricing
• Strapi — Open-source, self-hosted option, great for custom data models
• Contentful — Enterprise headless, mature ecosystem, higher cost but strong support

For JAMstack

Next.js + any headless CMS — If you're building a marketing site that needs to be blazing fast with modern deployment workflows (Vercel, Netlify).

My honest recommendation

Context is everything. Sitefinity isn't a bad choice for new projects—it's a contextual choice.

If you're currently on Sitefinity and it's working, don't migrate just because it's not trendy. Migration projects are expensive, risky, and often deliver less value than promised. Sitefinity 15.4 LTS supports you through 2030—that's real stability.

If you're evaluating Sitefinity for a new project, ask the right questions:

• Do you need enterprise features, complex multisite management, or multilingual at scale?
• Do you have (or can you hire) .NET developers?
• Does your organization already operate in the Microsoft ecosystem?
• Will you leverage the AI capabilities and personalization tools?
• Does the budget support enterprise-grade licensing?

If those answers are yes, Sitefinity is a strong choice—even for new projects. I still build Sitefinity sites today precisely because the right context makes it the best tool for the job.

If those answers are mostly no—you're building something simpler, budget is tight, or you need maximum developer velocity with a small team—modern alternatives will serve you better.

The web development world has moved toward lighter, faster stacks, but that doesn't make Sitefinity wrong. It makes it specialized. Some projects need that specialization.

Don't let a vendor's sales pitch convince you it's the only option. It's not. But also don't let tech trends convince you it's obsolete. It's not that either. Evaluate based on your project requirements, team capabilities, and business context—not hype cycles.

Your turn

Are you working with Sitefinity? Thinking about migrating away—or toward it? What's your experience with Sitefinity's AI features?

Find me on X or LinkedIn.

I work across .NET and Laravel ecosystems. If you need Sitefinity expertise or want to explore alternatives, let's talk.

I offer hands-on consulting to help you resolve technical challenges and improve your CMS implementations.

Get in touch if you'd like support diagnosing or upgrading your setup with confidence.

Learn more